RSS Feed From Unique Cars and Parts Classifieds


Fiat 132

Share On Facebook
Send This Page To A Friend
Fiat

Fiat 132 1800 GLS

1972 - 1981
Country:
  Italy
Engine:
  4 cyl.
Capacity:
  1756cc
Power:
  see below
Transmission:
  4/5 spd. man
Top Speed:
  108 mph
Number Built:
  678,700 (All Markets)
Collectability:
  1 star
 
Unfortunately many believed the Fiat 132 was a somewhat backward step, particularly given that the car, as a replacement for the Fiat 125, retained both rear-wheel-drive and a live back-axle. The new and lower line met with a mixed reception, some people considering that the 132's shape was "Japanese-inspired".

The 132 was released in April 1972, and with its twin-cam engine and optional 5-speed gearbox it promised to be competitive with both Japanese and British cars, including the new British Leyland six-cylinder f.w.d. 2200 model, and with the single-o.h.c. 2-litre Datsun and Toyota offerings.

Once behind the wheel, it would take a little while for the 132 to show its real talent. The engine would tend to hunt and stall in traffic, and there were plenty of shortcomings evident. For instance, while the accelerator was much too heavy and its cranked stalk seemed all too likely to snap off, the disc brakes were over-servoed. This made the right leg tired and the left leg flustered, and the high-set accelerator pedal made heel-and-toeing impossible.

The throttle also tended to stick, ruining a decent tick-over. The central handbrake, which was often used by owners to prevent the engine from stalling when stuck in traffic-jams, was incredibly heavy to pull up. The facia-mounted hand-throttle-cum-choke was equally stiff, and owners often reported that a stong petrol smell was all too evident.

Although the instruments - speedometer, tachometer, oil-pressure gauge, electric clock, and combined heat/fuel gauge, by Veglia - were recessed in the imitation wood panel, they were sometimes difficult if not impossible to read, due to reflected light. They were also of three different sizes, but neatly spaced.

The steering wheel had an uncomfortably thick rim and parking called for considerable effort. Although a facia shelf and door pockets were provided, the under-scuttle cubby had a very awkward catch and one that tended to claw any hands that were thrust into the invisible well. The lid of the very spacious boot flew up when released, hoping to smack you on the chin, the rear doors were often difficult to open (although this varied car to car), and the engine was not a particularly prompt commencer from cold.

If you switched-off the ignition the brakes almost immediately became ineffective, because there was no reasonable vacuum reserve. It would seem, therefore, that the Fiat 132 was a below average offering - but that would not be telling the whole story. Out on the open road, the 1,756 c.c. twin-cam 104 m.p.h. Fiat got along very well. The suspension was apt to lurch laterally to some extent and the gearbox was inclined to be baulky. But this was a comfortable way of driving quickly and by judicious use of the fifth gear it was possible to achieve impressive fuel ecomony approaching 30 m.p.g. on a long run.

If you didn't mind the Fiat triple-stalk levers on the steering column, most of the controls were well contrived, and items like a heated rear window, red light on the door extremities, flush-fitting door handles, dual headlamps, cigarette lighter, etc. were included. The comfortable seats were cloth-upholstered, and the ventilating system worked extremely well. Standard kit included an adjustable steering column, thermo-electric fan, all-disc dual-circuit brakes, single-speed wipers with electric washers and an intermediate action for light rain, etc.

The Fiat 132 came with 7 different engine combinations:

  • 1.6 litre petrol producing 98 hp (73 kW) 1592 cc (later 1585 cc after 1977)
  • 1.8 litre petrol with 107 hp (80 kW) 1756 cc
  • 1.8 litre petrol with 111 hp (83 kW) 1756 cc
  • 2.0 litre petrol 112 hp (84 kW) 1995 cc (from 1977)
  • 2.0 litre petrol with fuel injection producing 122 hp (91 kW) 1995 cc (from 1977)
  • 2.5 litre diesel with 60 hp (45 kW) 2435 cc
  • 2.5 litre diesel with 72 hp (54 kW) 2435 cc
The second major facelift of Fiat 132 came in 1981, along with a new name, the Fiat Argenta. Other changes included new trim, wheels, dashboard, mirrors and rectangular headlights. The Argenta came with a choice of 4 different engines (market dependent):
  • 1.6 litre petrol producing 90 hp (67 kW) 1585 cc
  • 2.0 litre petrol with 113 hp (84 kW) 1995 cc
  • 2.0 litre petrol with Bosch L-jetronic fuel injection producing 122 hp (91 kW) 1995 cc
  • 2.5 litre diesel with 75 hp (56 kW) 2435 cc

Digiplex electronic ignition was fitted to some 2.0i models. In 1984, the Argenta was face-lifted. The grille was renewed with the then corporate 5-bar grille, and an anti-roll-bar was mounted on the rear axle. The front axle was widened by 40 mm (1.6 in), and new wheels with flat wheel trims & chrome embelishers used. Some minor changes were made inside the car, most notably to the style and colour of seat trim. The Argenta also had two new engines: Fiat's first turbodiesel, 2.5 litre producing 90 hp (67 kW), and for the Argenta VX a supercharged engine with 135 hp (101 kW), derived from the Lancia Volumex models.

The car remained in production until 1986 when it was replaced by the Croma.

Visitor Rating:



Also see:


Fiat Heritage
Fiat Argenta
Reader Reviews page 1 of 1
Click here to add your review
zac
Posted 74 days ago
I will have to agree with Maxwell. The 132 is still my favourite car ever owned (now have a 2002 peugeot gti, home built locost (lotus 7 replica) and Honda s800) . My fiat was tired and rusted but it had something remarkable. It always went, i live in Tasmania where it was often below 0 celcius of a morning but my fiat always fired, and drove excellently. Yes the suspension was soggy, the accelerator stiff and in the wrong position, the steering very heavy at low speed, but the noise it made at 2200 - 2500 rpm always made me smile. No car makes such a strange but inspiring sound from its exhaust. Not to mention the flawless glide through bends a fiat 132 could produce. I know car lovers all describe alfas as having soul and personality to spare but a fiat 132 will always be my favourite in terms of heart and true character.
Maxwell
Posted 209 days ago
Unlike other contributers, I would like to say that I have had a very long and positive experience with 132 ownership. It would not be an understatement to say that during ownership I found that the cars were rather bland - but when I parted company for something else - which I did several times - I found replacement vehicles absolutely dreadful in comparason ( Alfetta, Alfa 90, Fuego, Audi 100 and 200, big 3 company vehicles etc) and always ended up yearning for another 132. I have owned 4 132's now. I would characterise them as being extremely reliable and well designed motor vehicles and an insane bargain at the few hundred dollars that they sell for.
All 4 that I have owned have the post 1976 improvements such as the big Salisbury diff and the ZF 5 speed gearbox and some, the Bosch/Marelli electronic ignition - none of which was fitted to the popular 124 sport. I have owned a couple of 124 coupes and am a big Fiat fan but I find I prefer 4 doors.
All 132's I have owned, I make a couple of simple changes - fit a ground out twin port exhaust manifold and header pipe and fit a 125s ignition distributer to the non electronic ign cars, and advance the ignition a little also. Those simple changes make the driving experience very lively.
My advice to anyone that has the opportunity to purchase a 132 ( and there are very few left) - if you buy it you will have a great car.
Tommy
Posted 241 days ago
The Fiat 132 GLS was, in my opinion, the absolute worst car ever made and driven. It suffered from rust, instability, unreliabilty, engine problems, starting problems, and just about every car problem one could think of. The only plus I could give it is its fast performance - when it did work. Horrible car. Good riddence.
Brian
Posted 352 days ago
This car marked the decline of Fiats in Australia. It was well built and reliable but lacked any real character like the 125 it replaced. It was a real backward, step the handling and performance was poor due to the soft suspension and extra weight. A reliable but boring car.
 
back
Unique Cars and Parts - The Ultimate Classic Car Resource
next